Master LLMs with our FREE course in collaboration with Activeloop & Intel Disruptor Initiative. Join now!

Publication

Knowledge of RAID-based System Storage Architectures
Latest   Machine Learning

Knowledge of RAID-based System Storage Architectures

Last Updated on July 17, 2023 by Editorial Team

Author(s): Deepankar Varma

Originally published on Towards AI.

The amount of data produced and saved in the modern digital age is growing exponentially. To handle this data explosion, organizations need storage systems that are not only reliable and cost-effective but also provide high-performance levels. This is where RAID-based storage systems come into play. RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) is a technology that allows multiple physical disks to be combined into a single logical unit for improved performance, reliability, and capacity. This article will explore the different RAID-based storage system architectures and their characteristics.

Table Of Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. RAID Levels
  3. RAID Controllers
  4. RAID Arrays
  5. Benefits of RAID
  6. Drawbacks of RAID
  7. Conclusion

Introduction:

The data storage technology known as RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) combines numerous physical hard drives into a single logical unit. This logical unit provides improved performance, reliability, and capacity compared to traditional single-disk storage systems. RAID technology achieves this by distributing data across multiple disks, providing redundancy for data protection, and increasing overall storage capacity.
There are several different RAID levels, each with its benefits and drawbacks. The most commonly used RAID levels are RAID 0, 1, 5, and RAID 6.

RAID Levels:

Several RAID levels are available, each with its advantages and disadvantages. The most common RAID levels are:

RAID 0: RAID 0 provides improved performance and capacity by distributing data across multiple disks without providing any redundancy. In RAID 0, data is split into blocks and written to two or more disks simultaneously, which increases the read/write speed. However, since there is no redundancy, all data in the RAID array is lost if one disk fails. RAID 0 is commonly used when performance is more critical than data redundancy, such as gaming or video editing.

RAID 1: RAID 1 provides data redundancy by mirroring data across two or more disks. In RAID 1, data is written to two or more disks simultaneously, providing redundancy in case one disk fails. This redundancy offers increased data protection but comes at the cost of reduced capacity, as only half of the total disk space is available for storage. RAID 1 is commonly used when data protection is more important than performance in financial or medical systems.

RAID 5: RAID 5 provides both data redundancy and increased capacity by distributing data across three or more disks and using parity data to provide redundancy. In RAID 5, data is split into blocks and written to three or more disks simultaneously, with the parity data being distributed across all disks. This parity data provides redundancy in case one disk fails, allowing the RAID array to continue operating without data loss. RAID 5 provides increased capacity compared to RAID 1, as only one disk’s worth of space is used for parity data. However, RAID 5 is more susceptible to data loss if multiple disks fail simultaneously. RAID 5 is commonly used when performance and data redundancy is essential, such as in file servers.

RAID Configuration

RAID 6: RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 but has an additional parity information set, providing double redundancy. This means that two disks can fail simultaneously without any data loss. RAID 6 requires at least four disks to implement and provides excellent data protection, but at the cost of reduced performance due to the extra parity calculations.

RAID 10: RAID 10, also known as RAID 1+0, combines RAID 1 and RAID 0. Compared to RAID 0 or RAID 1 alone, it improves performance and fault tolerance. In RAID 10, data is divided into blocks, and each block is mirrored onto a different disk. Then, the mirrored blocks are striped across additional disks. This allows for high performance and fault tolerance but requires at least four disks.

RAID 50: RAID 50 combines RAID 5 and RAID 0. It strips data across multiple RAID 5 arrays, each with distributed parity, and then strips the resulting blocks across additional disks. This allows for high performance and fault tolerance but requires at least six disks.

RAID 60: RAID 60 combines RAID 6 and RAID 0. It strips data across multiple RAID 6 arrays, each with two sets of distributed parity, and then strips the resulting blocks across additional disks. This provides high performance and excellent fault tolerance but requires at least eight disks.

RAID Controllers:

RAID controllers are hardware or software components responsible for managing the RAID array. They provide a layer of abstraction between the operating system and the disks, presenting the array as a single logical disk to the operating system. RAID controllers can be either software-based or hardware-based.
Software-based RAID controllers are implemented using the operating system’s built-in RAID capabilities. These controllers have the advantage of being inexpensive and easy to set up, as they do not require any additional hardware. However, software-based RAID controllers may impact system performance, as they rely on the host CPU to perform the parity calculations.

RAID Controllers

On the other hand, hardware-based RAID controllers are specialized components designed specifically for managing RAID arrays. These controllers typically have their processor and memory, which offloads the RAID calculations from the host CPU. Hardware-based RAID controllers provide better performance and reliability than software-based controllers but are more expensive.

RAID Arrays:

RAID arrays can be implemented using either internal or external disks. Internal disks are installed inside the server or storage system, while external disks are housed in an external enclosure that connects to the server or storage system via a cable.

Internal RAID arrays are typically used in servers or storage systems with multiple drive bays. The drives are installed directly into the server or storage system, and the RAID controller manages the array.

External RAID arrays are often used when additional storage is required, but there is limited space for other internal disks. External displays typically connect to the server or storage system via a high-speed interface such as Fibre Channel, SAS, or iSCSI.

When used in a storage system, RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) provides several benefits and drawbacks. Here are some of the main advantages and disadvantages of RAID technology:

Benefits of RAID:

1. Improved performance: RAID technology distributes data across multiple disks, allowing faster reading and writing speeds.

2. Data redundancy: Many RAID levels provide data redundancy, meaning that the data can be recovered from the other disks in the array if one disk fails. This provides increased data protection and prevents data loss.

3. Increased capacity: RAID technology provides increased storage capacity compared to traditional single-disk storage systems by combining multiple disks into a single logical unit.

4. Hot-swapping: Many RAID systems support hot-swapping, which means that a failed disk can be replaced while the system is still running without needing to shut it down.

5. Cost-effective: Depending on the RAID level used, RAID technology can be a cost-effective solution for data storage, especially compared to high-capacity, high-performance single disks.

Drawbacks of RAID:

1. Complexity: RAID technology can be complex to set up and manage, especially for larger arrays. This requires specialized knowledge and experience.

2. Cost: Some RAID levels, such as RAID 5 or RAID 6, require additional hardware (such as a dedicated RAID controller), which can add to the overall cost of the system.

3. Reduced performance: Some RAID levels, such as RAID 1 or RAID 5, can result in reduced performance due to the overhead of data parity calculations.

4. Data loss: While RAID provides data redundancy, there is still a risk of data loss if multiple disks fail simultaneously or the RAID controller fails.

5. Limited scalability: Some RAID levels have limited scalability, meaning they cannot be easily expanded beyond a certain number of disks. This can determine the growth potential of a RAID-based storage system.

Conclusion:

RAID-based storage systems have become the norm in many industries, including business, scientific research, and media production. By using multiple disks in a single logical unit, RAID provides improved performance, reliability, and capacity compared to traditional single-disk storage systems. Different RAID levels offer varying performance levels, fault tolerance, and ability, allowing organizations to choose the class that best suits their needs. The operating system sees the array as a single logical disc thanks to the layer of abstraction that RAID controllers put between it and the discs. Depending on the organization’s requirements, RAID arrays can be implemented using either internal or external disks.

RAID Levels Explained

When designing a RAID-based storage system, it is crucial to consider the performance, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of different RAID levels and the capabilities of other RAID controllers.

It is also essential to consider the organization’s requirements, such as the amount of data being generated and the speed at which it needs to be accessed. By carefully selecting the appropriate RAID level and components, organizations can build a storage system that meets their needs while providing high performance, reliability, and capacity.

Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.

Published via Towards AI

Feedback ↓