Name: Towards AI Legal Name: Towards AI, Inc. Description: Towards AI is the world's leading artificial intelligence (AI) and technology publication. Read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world. Phone Number: +1-650-246-9381 Email: [email protected]
228 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003 United States
Website: Publisher: https://towardsai.net/#publisher Diversity Policy: https://towardsai.net/about Ethics Policy: https://towardsai.net/about Masthead: https://towardsai.net/about
Name: Towards AI Legal Name: Towards AI, Inc. Description: Towards AI is the world's leading artificial intelligence (AI) and technology publication. Founders: Roberto Iriondo, , Job Title: Co-founder and Advisor Works for: Towards AI, Inc. Follow Roberto: X, LinkedIn, GitHub, Google Scholar, Towards AI Profile, Medium, ML@CMU, FreeCodeCamp, Crunchbase, Bloomberg, Roberto Iriondo, Generative AI Lab, Generative AI Lab Denis Piffaretti, Job Title: Co-founder Works for: Towards AI, Inc. Louie Peters, Job Title: Co-founder Works for: Towards AI, Inc. Louis-François Bouchard, Job Title: Co-founder Works for: Towards AI, Inc. Cover:
Towards AI Cover
Logo:
Towards AI Logo
Areas Served: Worldwide Alternate Name: Towards AI, Inc. Alternate Name: Towards AI Co. Alternate Name: towards ai Alternate Name: towardsai Alternate Name: towards.ai Alternate Name: tai Alternate Name: toward ai Alternate Name: toward.ai Alternate Name: Towards AI, Inc. Alternate Name: towardsai.net Alternate Name: pub.towardsai.net
5 stars – based on 497 reviews

Frequently Used, Contextual References

TODO: Remember to copy unique IDs whenever it needs used. i.e., URL: 304b2e42315e

Resources

Unlock the full potential of AI with Building LLMs for Productionβ€”our 470+ page guide to mastering LLMs with practical projects and expert insights!

Publication

Stacking Results: Alibaba Improves Search Services for Online Shoppers
Latest   Machine Learning

Stacking Results: Alibaba Improves Search Services for Online Shoppers

Last Updated on July 25, 2023 by Editorial Team

Author(s): Alibaba Tech

Originally published on Towards AI.

Academic Alibaba, WWW Series U+007C Towards AI

Experimenting with hierarchical reinforcement learning to obtain remarkable results on customer satisfaction

This article is part of the Academic Alibaba series and is taken from the WWW 2019 paper entitled β€œAggregating E-commerce Search Results from Heterogeneous Sources via Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning” by Ryuichi Takanobu, Tao Zhuang, Minlie Huang, Jun Feng, Haihong Tang, and Bo Zheng. The full paper can be read here.

Search for a type of cuisine in your web browser and you’ll likely reach a results page that starts with a map of restaurants near you. Add a word like β€œmaking” to your search, though, and you’ll more likely be presented with an excerpt from a recipe, followed shortly by links to cooking videos.

Like browsers, e-commerce platforms like Taobao generate aggregate search results that vary in type and order based on perceptions about users’ interests. Along with links to product pages, for example, results can include blog posts or topic groups about a type of merchandise, reflecting complex algorithmic decisions about whether to pitch a sale directly or influence a later purchase. To make these choices, systems sort through an enormous pool of candidate items by assigning each item a relevance score. The problem is, the relevance scores for different source types β€” or β€œverticals” β€” are not directly comparable, challenging systems to compile items from heterogenous verticals into pages that will drive sales. Furthermore, where web browsers do this just once per search, e-commerce applications need to select verticals repeatedly for each page of results to effectively meet shoppers’ expectations.

Results (in Chinese) for an aggregate search of β€œDress” on Taobao, with results from the Topic and Blog verticals in slots 2 and 5, respectively.

Now, researchers at Alibaba have proposed a novel hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) model that breaks results selection into two separate tasks for source selection and item presentation, ensuring that only items within each chosen source type need to be ranked. By formulating both tasks as sequential decision problems that learn from user behavior, the model has generated significantly stronger results than predecessors in tests of key metrics using real-time search data from Taobao.

Putting Verticals in Perspective

Recent work studying the value of search results indicates that an aggregate of heterogeneous sources has the benefit of letting users explore various verticals based on preference. However, studies have also shown that presenting irrelevant verticals can quickly generate negative impressions, adding a measure of risk to any effort to introduce variety.

To enhance the selection of verticals, the proposed model introduces a high-level policy that responds to sequential patterns in user behavior. It then passes its choices to a low-level presentation policy that ranks items into stacks one vertical at a time, treating each display position as a slot option designated for the top item in the corresponding stack. As a result of this configuration, the problem of mismatched relevance scores across verticals is avoided entirely. In addition, the model applies a Q network to both policies to minimize divergence and oscillations during the training process and enable the application of constraints that may become necessary for commercial purposes, such as preventing the display of any blog posts in a results page.

Overview of the item selection process in which slots are filled with items from ranked stacks in verticals A, B, and C

Trial by Taobao

To evaluate the proposed model’s performance, researchers tested it against competitors using hourly real-time search log data following a methodology called bucket testing β€” known to many as A/B testing. In preparation, users were randomly hashed into buckets in even numbers and distributions, with each bucket receiving one algorithm to test over a period of two weeks to ensure the statistical stability of results. Key metrics included click-through rate (CTR) per vertical, average dwell time (ADT) in seconds spent considering each vertical, and coverage (COV) in terms of the number of slots a vertical occupied. Additionally, the gross merchandise volume (GMV) for each search service was measured to test its ability to generate revenue.

Compared with several models from rule-based and learning-to-aggregate approaches, the proposed HRL model achieved a far greater CTR improvement over the baseline while holding steady with others’ performance in ADT and COV. Furthermore, the HRL model was the only one to impactfully increase the GMV for product searches β€” an area where others failed even when they could raise GMV for topic group and blog verticals.、

The full paper can be read on Arxiv.

Alibaba Tech

First hand and in-depth information about Alibaba’s latest technology β†’ Facebook: β€œAlibaba Tech”. Twitter: β€œAlibabaTech”.

Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming aΒ sponsor.

Published via Towards AI

Feedback ↓