LLM Benchmarks in 2024.
Author(s): Tim Cvetko
Originally published on Towards AI.
An Overview of Why LLM Benchmarks Exist, How They Work, and Whatβs Next
LLMs are complex. Although most of us used ChatGPT to β¦
Write me a 100-word paragraph about the history of Greek poetry.
or
give me a dirty joke about old people
Image generated with Stable Diffusion. Obviously, weβre not there yet.
LLMs have increasingly specific and generalistic capabilities that spawn across language understanding, memorization, and maths. As these LLMs adopt ever-greater size, their performance starts to ensue into βwhat it means to be humanβ, i.e. their reasoning capabilities.
Who is this article useful for? AI Engineers, Founders, VCs, etc.
How advanced is this post? Anybody remotely acquainted with LLM should be able to follow along.
Follow for more of my content: timc102.medium.com
Traditional metrics, like accuracy and F1 score, fall short of capturing the complexities of evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs). LLMs deal with intricate language tasks that are generative and random at their core. Success depends on a nuanced understanding of context, semantics, and pragmatics.
How do we measure an LLMβs model performance? To measure and compare LLM holistically, you can make use of benchmarks that have been established to test modelsβ performances across multiple specific reasoning tasks.
Benchmarks provide a standardized way to evaluate and improve LLMs, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in different language tasks.
Benchmarks, such as GLUE,… Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming aΒ sponsor.
Published via Towards AI