The Unexpected Edge: Why Niceness Triumphs in Game Theory

Author(s): Shanaka C. DeSoysa

Originally published on Towards AI.

How ‘Nice’ Strategies Outperform the Rest in the Prisoner’s Dilemma

This member-only story is on us. Upgrade to access all of Medium.

Photo by Vasilios Muselimis on Unsplash

In the realm of strategic decision-making, an unexpected champion emerges from the game theory landscape: the ‘nice’ strategy. This article delves into the surprising efficacy of ‘nice’ strategies, specifically focusing on their dominance in the classic prisoner’s dilemma, illuminating how niceness prevails in a world of conflicts and its relevance to software engineers and data scientists.

The prisoner’s dilemma serves as a foundational concept in game theory, depicting a scenario where two rational individuals must decide whether to cooperate or defect, each aiming to maximize their own outcome. The dilemma is structured as follows:

If both players cooperate, they receive a moderate reward.If one defects while the other cooperates, the defector gets a high reward while the cooperator receives nothing.If both defect, both receive a minimal reward.

Game theory principles have broad applications, from economics to artificial intelligence. In the realm of technology, understanding strategic interactions plays a pivotal role, influencing decision-making in algorithms, machine learning, and software development.

Let’s simulate the prisoner’s dilemma using Python to explore strategies and their performances in repeated dilemmas. Here’s a snippet of Python code showcasing a simulation with multiple strategies:

import randomimport… Read the full blog for free on Medium.

Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.

Published via Towards AI