Unifying Indian Mobile & Internet Plans with AI and Graph Databases — (Production-ready, Gemini structured outputs)
Last Updated on October 6, 2025 by Editorial Team
Author(s): Krishna Kumar S
Originally published on Towards AI.
TL;DR
The LLM (Gemini) is used with structured output via ChatGoogleGenerativeAI.with_structured_output(...) to directly return validated Pydantic objects from text files containing plans data. The pipeline then writes the cleaned records into Neo4j.

This article discusses the importance of comparing telecom plans from major providers in India, emphasizing the need for a canonical representation of data to discern differences. It outlines the technological approach of employing an LLM for structured outputs, Pydantic for validation, and Neo4j for graph representation, creating a robust framework for managing and comparing these plans effectively across various platforms.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Towards AI Academy
We Build Enterprise-Grade AI. We'll Teach You to Master It Too.
15 engineers. 100,000+ students. Towards AI Academy teaches what actually survives production.
Start free — no commitment:
→ 6-Day Agentic AI Engineering Email Guide — one practical lesson per day
→ Agents Architecture Cheatsheet — 3 years of architecture decisions in 6 pages
Our courses:
→ AI Engineering Certification — 90+ lessons from project selection to deployed product. The most comprehensive practical LLM course out there.
→ Agent Engineering Course — Hands on with production agent architectures, memory, routing, and eval frameworks — built from real enterprise engagements.
→ AI for Work — Understand, evaluate, and apply AI for complex work tasks.
Note: Article content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.