LLMs Don’t Think. They Just Get Lucky.
Author(s): Devrim Ozcay
Originally published on Towards AI.
LLMs Don’t Think. They Just Get Lucky.
I spent six months feeding GPT-4 the same prompt 10,000 times and got 10,000 different answers. Not slightly different. Completely different. Same temperature. Same parameters. Same everything.
The article discusses the limits of Large Language Models (LLMs), arguing that they operate on complex patterns rather than actual understanding or reasoning. The author highlights experiments showing LLMs struggle with consistency and can produce wildly differing results to the same prompt. As a caution against overestimating AI capabilities, they point out that LLMs are good at matching templates found in training data but fail in unpredictable situations, warning that relying on them as intelligent agents is a mistake. The piece concludes by urging readers to reconsider their expectations of LLMs and to treat them as valuable but ultimately limited tools.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Take our 90+ lesson From Beginner to Advanced LLM Developer Certification: From choosing a project to deploying a working product this is the most comprehensive and practical LLM course out there!
Towards AI has published Building LLMs for Production—our 470+ page guide to mastering LLMs with practical projects and expert insights!

Discover Your Dream AI Career at Towards AI Jobs
Towards AI has built a jobs board tailored specifically to Machine Learning and Data Science Jobs and Skills. Our software searches for live AI jobs each hour, labels and categorises them and makes them easily searchable. Explore over 40,000 live jobs today with Towards AI Jobs!
Note: Content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.