Google Just Killed $200/Month AI Coding Tools With This Free Terminal Assistant
Last Updated on August 29, 2025 by Editorial Team
Author(s): Poojan Vig
Originally published on Towards AI.
Google Just Killed $200/Month AI Coding Tools With This Free Terminal Assistant
On June 25, 2025, Google dropped a nuclear bomb on the AI coding assistant market. While developers have been shelling out $20-$200 monthly for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and other AI tools, Google just released Gemini CLI — a terminal-based AI assistant that matches (and often beats) these expensive tools for the revolutionary price of $0.

Google’s Gemini CLI offers developers a powerful AI coding assistant absolutely free, featuring generous usage limits and capabilities that rival expensive competitors. The article explores its quick setup, installation methods, and how developers can use Gemini to enhance their coding projects without incurring monthly fees, revolutionizing access to advanced AI tools for the coding community.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Take our 90+ lesson From Beginner to Advanced LLM Developer Certification: From choosing a project to deploying a working product this is the most comprehensive and practical LLM course out there!
Towards AI has published Building LLMs for Production—our 470+ page guide to mastering LLMs with practical projects and expert insights!

Discover Your Dream AI Career at Towards AI Jobs
Towards AI has built a jobs board tailored specifically to Machine Learning and Data Science Jobs and Skills. Our software searches for live AI jobs each hour, labels and categorises them and makes them easily searchable. Explore over 40,000 live jobs today with Towards AI Jobs!
Note: Content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.