How ChatGPT Makes You Addicted
Last Updated on May 4, 2026 by Editorial Team
Author(s): Felix Pappe
Originally published on Towards AI.
The downward spiral of relying on AI Agents
Chatbots have taken the world by storm.

The article discusses the rapid adoption and integration of AI and chatbots in everyday life, emphasizing the addictive nature of these technologies. It examines the factors contributing to their popularity, including both external triggers such as advertising and social influence, as well as internal triggers related to personal emotions and social validation. Various models and psychological frameworks, like the Hook Model by Nir Eyal, are discussed to illustrate how these systems create user habits. The author raises concerns about potential over-reliance on these technologies, while also pointing towards the beneficial aspects of their use in enhancing productivity and understanding.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Towards AI Academy
We Build Enterprise-Grade AI. We'll Teach You to Master It Too.
15 engineers. 100,000+ students. Towards AI Academy teaches what actually survives production.
Start free — no commitment:
→ 6-Day Agentic AI Engineering Email Guide — one practical lesson per day
→ Agents Architecture Cheatsheet — 3 years of architecture decisions in 6 pages
Our courses:
→ AI Engineering Certification — 90+ lessons from project selection to deployed product. The most comprehensive practical LLM course out there.
→ Agent Engineering Course — Hands on with production agent architectures, memory, routing, and eval frameworks — built from real enterprise engagements.
→ AI for Work — Understand, evaluate, and apply AI for complex work tasks.
Note: Article content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.