Your Model Has 95% Accuracy. It’s Completely Useless.
Last Updated on October 11, 2025 by Editorial Team
Author(s): Rohan Mistry
Originally published on Towards AI.
You Built a Model That Predicts Everything as “No.” It Has 95% Accuracy. You Just Shipped Garbage.
Your boss: “How’s the fraud detection model?”
You: “95% accuracy! Ready to deploy!”
Your boss: “Great! Ship it.”

The article discusses the common pitfalls of relying solely on accuracy as a metric for evaluating machine learning models, using relatable scenarios like fraud detection to illustrate how misleading a high accuracy may be when it does not correlate with actual useful outcomes. The author emphasizes that a model’s effectiveness should not just be measured by accuracy but by how well it achieves business goals and responds to imbalanced datasets, advocating for prioritizing metrics like recall and precision based on the context and implications of model predictions.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Towards AI Academy
We Build Enterprise-Grade AI. We'll Teach You to Master It Too.
15 engineers. 100,000+ students. Towards AI Academy teaches what actually survives production.
Start free — no commitment:
→ 6-Day Agentic AI Engineering Email Guide — one practical lesson per day
→ Agents Architecture Cheatsheet — 3 years of architecture decisions in 6 pages
Our courses:
→ AI Engineering Certification — 90+ lessons from project selection to deployed product. The most comprehensive practical LLM course out there.
→ Agent Engineering Course — Hands on with production agent architectures, memory, routing, and eval frameworks — built from real enterprise engagements.
→ AI for Work — Understand, evaluate, and apply AI for complex work tasks.
Note: Article content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.