LLMs Don’t Think. They Just Get Lucky.
Author(s): Devrim Ozcay
Originally published on Towards AI.
LLMs Don’t Think. They Just Get Lucky.
I spent six months feeding GPT-4 the same prompt 10,000 times and got 10,000 different answers. Not slightly different. Completely different. Same temperature. Same parameters. Same everything.
The article discusses the limits of Large Language Models (LLMs), arguing that they operate on complex patterns rather than actual understanding or reasoning. The author highlights experiments showing LLMs struggle with consistency and can produce wildly differing results to the same prompt. As a caution against overestimating AI capabilities, they point out that LLMs are good at matching templates found in training data but fail in unpredictable situations, warning that relying on them as intelligent agents is a mistake. The piece concludes by urging readers to reconsider their expectations of LLMs and to treat them as valuable but ultimately limited tools.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Towards AI Academy
We Build Enterprise-Grade AI. We'll Teach You to Master It Too.
15 engineers. 100,000+ students. Towards AI Academy teaches what actually survives production.
Start free — no commitment:
→ 6-Day Agentic AI Engineering Email Guide — one practical lesson per day
→ Agents Architecture Cheatsheet — 3 years of architecture decisions in 6 pages
Our courses:
→ AI Engineering Certification — 90+ lessons from project selection to deployed product. The most comprehensive practical LLM course out there.
→ Agent Engineering Course — Hands on with production agent architectures, memory, routing, and eval frameworks — built from real enterprise engagements.
→ AI for Work — Understand, evaluate, and apply AI for complex work tasks.
Note: Article content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.