New Study: AI Models Fail at Basic Human Psychology Despite $50 Million Investment

Author(s): MKWriteshere

Originally published on Towards AI.

Bielefeld University research reveals why AI can’t replace humans in psychological studies

Sarah Schröder knew something was wrong the moment she saw the results.

The article discusses a research study conducted by Sarah Schröder and her team at Bielefeld University, which tests the capability of advanced AI models in understanding human psychology. It reveals significant failures in AI’s ability to discern moral nuances compared to human judgment. Using examples and experiments, the study demonstrates how AI, despite its technological sophistication, lacks the comprehension necessary for psychological insight. The findings emphasize the irreplaceable nature of human understanding and call for a re-evaluation of AI’s role in psychological research and other domains where moral reasoning is crucial.

Read the full blog for free on Medium.

Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.

Published via Towards AI