Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (Paper Review)
Last Updated on October 28, 2025 by Editorial Team
Author(s): Hira Ahmad
Originally published on Towards AI.
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (Paper Review)
Intelligence is not in thinking long, it’s in thinking right.
In the race to make machines reason like humans, we’ve trained models to think deeply but often, they end up thinking too much.

This article explores the dilemma of overthinking in Large Language Models (LLMs) and emphasizes the importance of efficient reasoning. It discusses how modern reasoning models often misinterpret depth as a measure of quality, leading to increased costs and decreased clarity. Various efficiency-focused approaches are proposed, emphasizing the necessity of training models to know when to stop reasoning. Future advancements in AI are positioned to redefine intelligence by focusing on smarter, not just deeper, reasoning.
Read the full blog for free on Medium.
Join thousands of data leaders on the AI newsletter. Join over 80,000 subscribers and keep up to date with the latest developments in AI. From research to projects and ideas. If you are building an AI startup, an AI-related product, or a service, we invite you to consider becoming a sponsor.
Published via Towards AI
Take our 90+ lesson From Beginner to Advanced LLM Developer Certification: From choosing a project to deploying a working product this is the most comprehensive and practical LLM course out there!
Towards AI has published Building LLMs for Production—our 470+ page guide to mastering LLMs with practical projects and expert insights!

Discover Your Dream AI Career at Towards AI Jobs
Towards AI has built a jobs board tailored specifically to Machine Learning and Data Science Jobs and Skills. Our software searches for live AI jobs each hour, labels and categorises them and makes them easily searchable. Explore over 40,000 live jobs today with Towards AI Jobs!
Note: Content contains the views of the contributing authors and not Towards AI.